Google Scholar: Pros and cons

PROS:
  • Provides citations in APA for each record and exports to EndNote.
  • Provides full text links to articles in journals/databases that user's library subscribes to.
  • Indexes grey literature and open source documents not always found in subscription based academic databases.
  • Not only shows "cited by" for articles in GS but also provides link to citing articles in Web of Science.

CONS
  • Sometimes makes parsing errors, e.g. confuses author name with article title.
  • Indexes material that is not considered scholarly, e.g. PPT presentations.
  • Limited advance search options, e.g. cannot do an author search by affiliation.
  • Cannot refine results by subject headings, document type, affiliation, etc.
  • Cannot click on an author in a record to see what else they have written (the exception is when an author has set up a profile in My Citations).
  • Is not very transparent, e.g. how it defines what it considers “scholarly,” what journals/databases are crawled and what metadata is considered for ranking search results.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

College news story about my work with DigitalNZ to make our theses accessible online

College news story about the academic database I acquired for the college

An unpleasant job interview experience