Google Scholar: Pros and cons
- Provides citations in APA for each record and exports to EndNote.
- Provides full text links to articles in journals/databases that user's library subscribes to.
- Indexes grey literature and open source documents not always found in subscription based academic databases.
- Not only shows "cited by" for articles in GS but also provides link to citing articles in Web of Science.
CONS
- Sometimes makes parsing errors, e.g. confuses author name with article title.
- Indexes material that is not considered scholarly, e.g. PPT presentations.
- Limited advance search options, e.g. cannot do an author search by affiliation.
- Cannot refine results by subject headings, document type, affiliation, etc.
- Cannot click on an author in a record to see what else they have written (the exception is when an author has set up a profile in My Citations).
- Is not very transparent, e.g. how it defines what it considers “scholarly,” what journals/databases are crawled and what metadata is considered for ranking search results.
Comments
Post a Comment